Monday, September 29, 2008

Summary

A group of scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have developed a new solar energy technology which is more efficient and can greatly reduce the carbon dioxide emissions.
Conventionally, scientists use semiconductor materials like silicon to produce solar cells and photovoltatic panels. Portion of the light incident on the semiconductor materials is absorbed to activate the electrons. Electric field(s) within the photovoltalic cells forces the electrons flow in certain direction to generate current. However, the process is too costly to make it a feasible alternative to the electricity form the power grid. The major breakthrough of the new technology is to minimize the solar cell to a postage stamp size and improve the efficiency from the conventional 14% to nearly 80%. The systems consist of lenses that can automatically trace the movement of the sun all the time and let the sunlight incident perpendicularly onto the solar cells. The lenses are incorporated into glass buildings and window panes to provide nearly 50% of the energy needed of the building operation.
In US today, residential and commercial buildings use 2/3 of all electricity and produce 35% of all carbon dioxide emissions, which is a great proportion. Both Anna Dyson, an architectural scientist, and Michael Jensen, a mechanical engineer, confirmed that the new technology is critical to reduce our dependency of fossil fuels and global warming.
The full-size prototype will be installed into the building at the Center for Excellence and Environmental Energy Systems and the Fashion Institute of Technology in 2008 and 2009 respectively.

(252 words)
The original passage “Mechanical Engineers Create High-tech Solar Panels” is from http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2007/0507-bringing_sunlight_inside.htm

3 comments:

Michael Ng said...

I think it's nice that you choosed to find and summarize an related article. I see that you chosed not to include the background and so on in your summary. That's understandable as I also find that that part of the article has too many details and hence it's hard to summarize it all up in your summary. One thing about your summary is that you split it into paragraphs? As far as I know most summaries are one paragraph long, so maybe you might want to keep that in consideration. Anyway, good work!

Anonymous said...

The summary is written in such a way that is easy to understand. The facts is summarized so well by using connectors in between. The grammar also quite accurate.
Well done.

Cathy (Rao Ying) said...

It is good that you have summarize the key points of the article in a clear and well-organized manner. However, I see a few points that stated about the facts with detailed data. I think it is somehow a bit more in detail with respect to a summary. Anyway, I am also not sure that it is alright to provide such details in a summary. Maybe we can just ask our tutor for help~~~ Anyway, it is a nice job in whole.